|
Payola
Crayola
A
Commentary of Sorts
by: kenny love
O, Fellow
Peasants! Lend me thine ears! Let me, for thee, a picture
paint.of Musical Pied Pipers, ultimately, elected as Kings
& Queens, awarded and adorned with crowns of Gold, and thrones
of Platinum.not through fairly and equally touching the hearts
of their audiences with their lyric, music, and song, but
bestowed with their vast wealth unfairly, by and from, a sprouted
vile root called 'Payola'.
My attempt
at becoming eligible for the Shakespearean Hall of Fame? Not!
But absolutely, my intentional address of the recent Payola
scandal as reported by Mr. Dan Whitcomb (Reuters/Los Angeles
bureau) in the July 2, 1999 edition of "Yahoo! News Entertainment
Headlines."
In Mr.
Whitcomb's article, titled "California Pop Music Execs. Charged
With 'Payola'," he addresses the recent scandal investigated
over a two-year period by U.S. prosecutors, whereby, two senior
executives of the popular Latin music label, Fonovisa, were
charged in a 'Payola' scandal. The scandal involved $2,000
in cash paid out by Fonovisa to a radio station Program Director
to play the label's music more frequently. The Times reported
that in 1997, Fonovisa dominated the Spanish radio airwaves
with a string of No.1 hits.
This incident
surprises me in a sense.not because it occurred, but because
of the reversion by the label's personnel to the original
and historical "cash" process. In my opinion, 'Payola' is,
indeed, very much alive in today's music industry, albeit
for the most part, shrouded in secrecy and isolated lavishness.
Today, it is reflected in "gifts" of fancy.expensive automobiles,
dinners, clothing, and materials of that ilk.
On occasion,
I converse with independent label personnel and independent
artists who wholly subscribe to the theory that the only possible
way for them to obtain exposure and recognition for their
recordings at the radio level is to grease the palms of PD's
with filthy lucre (Say it ain't so, Harry!) Is their theory
valid?
Well now,
consider that in today's world of first-class dumb-downery,
seemingly, in full bloom at every level of our modern, high-tech
society (did "dumb-downery" begin with "point & click?"),
and where deceit is often considered in the business world
as a close relative of adaptation, improvisation, and overcomeness,
I believe that there still exists radio station personnel
who will not play a recording if there is not an agreeable
consensus by the "other" party to play 'Payola'.
No.not
because the recording is not of the right format, or the opinion
that it is lacking in professional commercial sound quality.
But, in some cases, these excuses are what you, inevitably,
will encounter from 'Payola'-participating personnel at some
stations. This is based on the assumption that you provide
your recording to enough stations while involved in "the numbers
game" as an independent do-it-yourselfer without the "extra"
cash to go along with it.
Often,
'Payola' is as subtle as the suggestion of station personnel
to purchase advertisement for more favorable consideration.
But, don't get me wrong.I am NOT saying that every station
that rejects the idea of adding your recording to its playlist
should make your list of 'Usual Suspects'. That would be untrue.
However,
my advice? Simply this.if you should encounter rejection,
for whatever reason, don't dwell on it. Simply move on to
the next station. Thankfully, Payola is a demon not desiring
to emerge from the shadows to the spotlight. And, thankfully,
most station personnel are wonderful people there to help
you, and who will play the game fairly.
We
want you to voice your opinion!
If
you would like to let your voice be heard, write up your own
editorial column and mail it to editor@music-critic.com
If we post it, we promise not to censor it in any way and
you will get full credit.
Editorial
Policy: Music-Critic.com's articles and editorials are an
open forum of opinion. The views and opinions held in this
article are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect
those opinions held by Music-Critic.com
|